  Online nowIfNOT4GOD- Lives for Jesus. My name is Venitta and is a 45 year old married woman from Ilion, Up State,, New York, USA.
- Likes 1,248 pages, 62 videos, 182 photos • 486 fans • Received 164 reviews
- Member since Aug 27, 2007
Hi , if you meet me and forget me, you have lost little. But if you meet my LORD, and forget Him you will have lost ALL. . . I live a quiet life ♥ I am content / comfortable in my own skin ♥ I am a little to real for some people, sometime ♥ My world revolves around my faith ♥ My heart is old-fashioned and my mind is analytical all-in-one ♥ I am a Christian and I like quiet evening with friends or alone ♥ I consider myself to be a life-long learner and hopeless romantic ♥ I am dyslexic and there for do my reading and writing by way of Dragon Naturally Speaking ♥ So it may take me some time to respond to massages ♥ Oh I believe that the only time that a women gets to change a man, is: when he is a baby, LOL ♥ And my ideal of camping is a good hotel ♥ And no I do not live in the City ♥ I have a variety of interest ♥ These are just some of the things that I like, Intimacy with GOD ♥ People of Integrity ♥ Studying GODs Word ♥ Loving on People ♥ Random Act of Kindness ♥ Candlelight Bubble Bath and or Dinner ♥ Walking in the Rain and or on the Beach ♥ Playing in the Rain and or in a Brook ♥ The smell of the world after the rain ♥ Really Stormy Weather ♥ Watching a Camp Fire and or a Fire Place ♥ Chasing Fire Flies in the Dark ♥ Making Snow Angels ♥ and Igools Houses ♥ Sound of Rain on a Tin Roof ♥ Traveling ♥ Dancing ♥ And if you really wont to know who I am ♥ All you need to do is to look at my pic's and listen to the links togther with one another, and you will have the meat ( of the very core of my heart . . . ) P.S. FOIL the acronym for --- the freedom of information Law --- ♥ It is how people get information from government agencies ♥ It is the strongest tool we as citizens have at our disposal ♥ ___________________________________________________
*HUGS* TOTAL!
give ifNOT4GODsLOVE more *HUGS*
Get hugs of your own
___________________________________________________
Michael W. Smith-Secret Ambition
http://youtube.com/watch?v=1BRUsSztA44
http://www.care2.com/c2c/people/profile.html?pid=283117605
Favorites » Her Blog
-
-
.*.†.*.♥´¨´-♥.¸¸.-♥´¨´-♥.¸)US BE ONE(¸.♥-´¨´♥-.¸¸.♥-´´¨♥.*.†.*.
Mukasey Refuses to Say, on the Fourth Amendment Memo
By Paul Kiel - April 10, 2008, 11:24AM
During a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing this morning, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) questioned Attorney General Michael Mukasey about that October, 2001 Justice Department memo in which John You found that the Fourth Amendment, which protects citizens against "unreasonable searches and seizures," had "no application to domestic military operations."
Has that memo been withdrawn? If not, was it still in force? Feinstein wanted to know.
She found it difficult to pry an answer loose. "I can't speak to the October, 2001 memo," Mukasey said when she asked whether it had been withdrawn. He said that Yoo's later March, 2003 memo -- which broadly authorized the use of torture by military interrogators on unlawful combatants -- had been withdrawn, but refused to discuss that October, 2001 memo.
That memo remains classified, and Mukasey said that working to declassify portions of or entire secret Justice Department legal memos by Yoo and others was a "priority" of his, but he refused to supply a timeline for when he might make those determinations. He was very mindful of Congress' "legitimate oversight role," he said.
"This isn't a question of oversight," Feinstein said. "I'm just asking you, 'Is this memo in force that the Fourth Amendment does not apply?"
"The principle that the Fourth Amendment does not apply in wartime is not in force," Mukasey replied.
"That's not the principle I asked you about," Feinstein countered. The memo referred to domestic military operations, she said.
"There are no domestic military operations being carried out today," Mukasey replied.
"I'm asking you a question. That's not the answer."
"I'm unaware of any domestic military operations being carried out today," he repeated.
"You're not answering my question," she said.
Finally, Mukasey responded, "The Fourth Amendment applies across the board whether we're in wartime or peacetime. It applies across the board."
When Feinstein pronounced herself satisfied, Mukasey said, "with due respect, I don't think there's anything really new about that answer." He went on to imply that Yoo's discussion of the applicability of the Fourth Amendment had not been a crucial aspect of that memo. "The discussion of which that was a part... means the inaptness... the suggested inapplicability of the Fourth Amendment as an alternative basis for finding that searches discussed there would be reasonable."
"But Mr. Yoo's contention was that the Fourth Amendment did not apply and that the President was free to order domestic military operations," Feinstein replied.
"Without regard to the Fourth Amendment?"
"Yes."
"My understanding is that is not operative."
The Washington Post reported last week that the Justice Department "repudiated the idea that there are no constitutional limits to military searches and seizures in a time of war, saying it depends on 'the particular context and circumstances of the search.'"
Here's video of the exchange: youtube.com/watch [youtube.com/watch]
¨´♥-.¸)US-BE-ONE(¸.-♥¨´)†(Amen)†(¨´♥-.¸)ONE-BE-US(¸.-♥¨´
|
her Favorites
Add her as a friend >
