ifNOT4GOD's profile - StumbleUpon

Last login: 1 hour agoIfNOT4GOD: Lives for Jesus. My name is Venitta and is a 45 year old married woman from Ilion, Up State,, New York, USA.; Likes 1,146 pages, 58 videos, 178 photos • 483 fans • Received 162 reviews; Member since Aug 27, 2007

Favorites » Her Blog

Display:
List
• Grid

May 11, 4:54am: .*.†.*.♥΄¨΄-♥.ΈΈ.-♥΄¨΄-♥.Έ)US BE ONE(Έ.♥-΄¨΄♥-.ΈΈ.♥-΄΄¨♥.*.†.*.
Song youtube.com/watch [youtube.com/watch]

Welcome to the place where my heart resides . . .
Fame is a vapor, popularity an accident, riches take wing, and only character endures.

Horace Greeley
inspiringthots.net/m-all.htm [inspiringthots.net/m-all.htm]
¨΄♥-.Έ)US-BE-ONE(Έ.-♥¨΄)†(Amen)†(¨΄♥-.Έ)ONE-BE-US(Έ.-♥¨΄

May 11, 4:53am: .*.†.*.♥΄¨΄-♥.ΈΈ.-♥΄¨΄-♥.Έ)US BE ONE(Έ.♥-΄¨΄♥-.ΈΈ.♥-΄΄¨♥.*.†.*.

1. Do you know that thumbs-ups are extremely important at SU?

"Thumbs-ups are SU's way of obtaining information about what we like or approve of. The SU computer cannot read a review and goes only by thumbs-ups. So you should always give a thumbs-up when writing positive reviews, especially positive stumblers' reviews. Otherwise, your approval/vote will not be counted by the SU computer. This will defeat the whole point of your positive review. If you have any entries without thumbs-ups, you can correct the problem by visiting the main page of the appropriate site and clicking "I like them!"

2. Do you know that most people here at SU love beautiful images?

They adore them! By not taking a beautiful picture when reviewing a stumbler, one is working against oneself as well as the stumbler being reviewed. So review with a picture unless you really hate pictures! It will make your site more beautiful, and both you and the stumbler reviewed will be reviewed more often.

3. Do you know that SU only allows a maximum of 200 friends?

Yes, indeed. So please don't feel offended if a person you add does not add you in return.

¨΄♥-.Έ)US-BE-ONE(Έ.-♥¨΄)†(Amen)†(¨΄♥-.Έ)ONE-BE-US(Έ.-♥¨΄

May 11, 4:53am: .*.†.*.♥΄¨΄-♥.ΈΈ.-♥΄¨΄-♥.Έ)US BE ONE(Έ.♥-΄¨΄♥-.ΈΈ.♥-΄΄¨♥.*.†.*.
The pic is the link for information

The computer system called the B.E.A.S.T.S. in Brussels, Belgium records ATM and debit card transactions within 57 seconds. It is known what you bought and where you bought it. B.E.A.S.T.S. stands for Brussels Electronic Accounting Surveillance Terminal Systems. It is a Cray Super Computer. The Beast of the Apocalypse: 666 B.E.A.S.T. Battle Engagement And Simulated Tracking

Anything greater than a $5 dollar bill with a date of 1992 or above has a metallic strip running through it. You can see this strip if you hold it up to the light. The technology is in place for someone with the correct equipment to drive by your home with a special scanner and know approximately how much money you have in your home. It was placed there under a partial truth as a way to track drug money, but in reality serves other purposes, since all nations of the world have the same strip in them. (The computers don't care what country or what picture is on the money, they still register the same numbers) COVERT ACTIVITIES AND COVER-UPS MOST PEOPLE ARE NOT AWARE OF |

Latest Privacy Nightmare: Money That Tracks You

More Than Just a Photo ID: UltraCard

BUSH CONTEMPLATES NATIONAL ID CARD FOR ALL CITIZENS

States Devising Plan for High-Tech National Identification Cards State motor vehicle authorities are working on a plan to create a national identification system for individuals that would link all driver databases and employ high-tech cards with a fingerprint, computer chip or other unique identifier. see Driver Licensing vs. the Right to Travel.

Pentagon Unveils 'Smart' ID Cards

ANOTHER STEP TAKEN IN PRODUCING THE MARK OF THE BEAST! NEW PATENT ISSUED FOR A MARK SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED FOR BUYING AND SELLING.

The naked truth is always better than the best dressed lie

Ann Landers

¨΄♥-.Έ)US-BE-ONE(Έ.-♥¨΄)†(Amen)†(¨΄♥-.Έ)ONE-BE-US(Έ.-♥¨΄

May 11, 4:52am: .*.†.*.♥΄¨΄-♥.ΈΈ.-♥΄¨΄-♥.Έ)US BE ONE(Έ.♥-΄¨΄♥-.ΈΈ.♥-΄΄¨♥.*.†.*.Link to information theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/omegafile34.htm [theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/omegafile34.htm]
Executive Orders [from 1939 through 1991] and amends Executive Order 10789 and 11790. This executive order is A DECLARATION OF WAR AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE by the [Secret] Government of the United States in concert with the UNITED NATIONS. Operation Dragnet. Janet Reno can implement this operation upon receiving one call from the President. Arrest warrants will be issued via computer to round-up over 1 MILLION PATRIOTIC AMERICANS who may 'resist' the NEW WORLD ORDER. Americans who are not 'politically correct.' Specifically mentioned are CHRISTIANS and or those who read the Bible. Cultist Definition by Janet Reno, Attorney General USA Concentration camps have already been built to accommodate these American prisoners. These camps have been setup and are run by F.E.M.A. See link above for the rest of the story.
___________________________

An internal threat to our freedoms, as guaranteed in the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, from my perspective, would justify us a Christens to fight back for OUR INALIENABLE RIGHTS THAT ARE / WHERE GOD GIVEN "." And if you where to study it out you would find that our four Fathers for the most part where men of GOD and prayer. Not to mention that when it comes down to following mens laws or GOD WE ARE TO FOLLOW GODS ! And as In Psalm 125:3 we read how the rule of the wicked is a DIRECT VIOLATION of the will of God . . . Do you know that our own government is trying to pass laws to TAKE OUR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS TO BEAR ARMS AWAY right now in congress .

Song youtube.com/watch [youtube.com/watch]

If WE as the people, do not fight for OUR RIGHTS, then one day WE will look around, and find that WE no longer have them,
TO FIGHT FOR US . . .

Venitta Lateer

If people did not just BLINDLY follow Hitler,
what happened to the Jews would of
never happened at all, now would it of . . .

Song youtube.com/watch [youtube.com/watch]
¨΄♥-.Έ)US-BE-ONE(Έ.-♥¨΄)†(Amen)†(¨΄♥-.Έ)ONE-BE-US(Έ.-♥¨΄

Individuals Right to Bear Arms at Issue: May 11, 4:52am 2 reviews laws
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8VFCPAG0&show_article=1; .*.†.*.♥΄¨΄-♥.ΈΈ.-♥΄¨΄-♥.Έ)US BE ONE(Έ.♥-΄¨΄♥-.ΈΈ.♥-΄΄¨♥.*.†.*.

The Corrosion of Our Rights
gunowners.org [gunowners.org]
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court gets to write on a blank slate when it takes up the meaning of the Second Amendment "right to keep and bear arms" and the District of Columbia's ban on handguns.

The nine justices have said almost nothing about gun rights, and their predecessors have likewise given no definitive answer to whether the Constitution protects an individual's right to own guns or whether that right is somehow tied to service in a state militia.

The case that will be argued Tuesday is among the most closely watched of the term, drawing 68 briefs from outside groups. Most of those support an individual's right to own a gun.

"This may be one of the only cases in our lifetime when the Supreme Court is going to interpret an important provision of our Constitution unencumbered by precedent," said Georgetown University law professor Randy Barnett.

Even if they determine there is an individual right, the justices still will have to decide whether the capital's 32-year-old handgun ban can stand and how to evaluate other gun control laws. This issue has caused division within the Bush administration, with Vice President Dick Cheney taking a harder line than the administration's official position at the court.

The local Washington government argues that its law should be allowed to remain in force whether or not the amendment applies to individuals, although it reads the amendment as intended to allow states to have armed forces.

The City Council that adopted the ban said it was justified because "handguns have no legitimate use in the purely urban environment of the District of Columbia."

Dick Anthony Heller, 65, an armed security guard, sued the District after it rejected his application to keep a handgun at his home--about a mile from the court--for protection. His lawyers say the amendment plainly protects an individual's right.

The 27 words and three enigmatic commas of the Second Amendment have been analyzed again and again by legal scholars, but hardly at all by the Supreme Court.

The amendment reads: "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

The last Supreme Court ruling on the topic came in 1939 in U.S. v. Miller, which involved a sawed-off shotgun. Constitutional scholars disagree over what that case means but agree it did not squarely answer the question of individual versus collective rights.

Chief Justice John Roberts said at his confirmation hearing that the correct reading of the Second Amendment was "still very much an open issue."

Heller lost his suit in U.S. District Court in Washington. By a 2-1 vote, a panel of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia struck down the handgun ban. Notably, it was the first appeals court to strike down a gun control law on the basis of an individual's Second Amendment rights.

In 2001, Attorney General John Ashcroft reversed long-standing Justice Department policy when he asserted that the Second Amendment protects individuals' rights. The administration's brief in this case holds to that view.

But Solicitor General Paul Clement told the court that reasonable restrictions should be allowed and warns that federal laws restricting sales of machine guns and barring felons from owning guns, among others, could be threatened under the appeals court ruling. Clement wants the court to send the case back to lower courts without deciding whether the handgun ban is reasonable.

Clement's brief was harshly criticized by supporters of gun rights. Cheney joined majorities in both the House and Senate in signing a brief that says a handgun ban is clearly unreasonable. Experts on the court could recall no other case in which a vice president took a public position disagreeing with the administration he serves.

Barnett is among those on both sides of the issue who believe the practical effect of the court's ruling will be limited.

Forty-four state constitutions contain some form of gun rights, which are not affected by the court's consideration of Washington's restrictions.

"There is almost no other enacted gun law that would be threatened by this case," Barnett said.

The case is Heller v. District of Columbia, 07-290.

gunowners.org [gunowners.org]
Supreme Court: supremecourtus.gov [supremecourtus.gov]

¨΄♥-.Έ)US-BE-ONE(Έ.-♥¨΄)†(Amen)†(¨΄♥-.Έ)ONE-BE-US(Έ.-♥¨΄

May 11, 4:50am: .*.†.*.♥΄¨΄-♥.ΈΈ.-♥΄¨΄-♥.Έ)US BE ONE(Έ.♥-΄¨΄♥-.ΈΈ.♥-΄΄¨♥.*.†.*.
The United States has no comprehensive privacy protection law for the private sector.

THAT'S MEANS FOR YOU & ME - YOU KNOW THE CITIZEN OF THE USA . . .
Pic is the link
People had better wake up, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE !
--------------------------------------------------
Most Televisions from early '90s to present are equipped with 2 way communication capabilities. The cable TV connection in the wall is a standard coax computer networking cable and provides a way for others to see into your home even though you are unaware of it. COVERT ACTIVITIES AND COVER-UPS MOST PEOPLE ARE NOT AWARE OF

Black Boxes and Marble Memorials, Cable T. V. Snooping
¨΄♥-.Έ)US-BE-ONE(Έ.-♥¨΄)†(Amen)†(¨΄♥-.Έ)ONE-BE-US(Έ.-♥¨΄

May 11, 4:50am: .*.†.*.♥΄¨΄-♥.ΈΈ.-♥΄¨΄-♥.Έ)US BE ONE(Έ.♥-΄¨΄♥-.ΈΈ.♥-΄΄¨♥.*.†.*.
Pic is the link to information, it is a MUST READ !
mindcontrolforums.com/pro-freedom.co.uk/part_1.html [mindcontrolforums.com/pro-freedom.co.uk/part_1.html]

'NON - LETHAL' WEAPONS UPON SOCIETY TOWARD SOCIAL CONTROL

Remotely Operated Electromagnetic Frequency Weapons, Using Microwave, ELF and Acoustic Frequency are being used to covertly attack innocent individuals in society.

The use of frequency weapons upon humans toward behavioural control and murder is not new.
For well over 50 years, Neuro-electromagnetic Frequency Weapons have been perfected for their covert uses.

These 'non-lethal' or 'silent' weapons, as they are known in the trade, have also been perfected and used for experimenting on innocent and unsuspecting public since their early development.

Presently, thousands of individuals, from all walks of life, have divulged that they have become targets of assault and even attempted murder from secret government agencies and police hierarchy via the use of these weapons.

mindcontrolforums.com/pro-freedom.co.uk/cov_us.html [mindcontrolforums.com/pro-freedom.co.uk/cov_us.html]
this link go's to here after information .

For electronic surveillance purposes, electrical activity can be sent into the speech center of the brain and translated into the subject's verbal thoughts. RNM can send encoded signals to the brain's auditory cortex, thus allowing audio communications direct to the brain (bypassing the ears). And RNM can send images direct to the visual cortex, bypassing the eyes and optic nerves. Those using this can make images and then put those images into a surveillance subject's brain while they are in REM sleep for brain-programming purposes. RNM is the ultimate method of surveillance in our USA intelligence forces. Speech, 3D sound and subliminal audio can be sent to the auditory cortex of the subject's brain (bypassing the ears), and images can be sent into the visual cortex. RNM can also alter a subject's perceptions, moods / emotional state, and controlled completely.

Using this they can covertly debilitate subjects by simulating auditory and visual hallucinations characteristic by paranoid schizophrenia.
Without any contact with the subject.

Remote Neural Monitoring can map out electrical activity from the visual cortex of a subject's brain and show images from the subject's brain on a video monitor. Those using this see what the surveillance subject's eyes are seeing. Visual memory can also be seen as well.
Song youtube.com/watch [youtube.com/watch]

¨΄♥-.Έ)US-BE-ONE(Έ.-♥¨΄)†(Amen)†(¨΄♥-.Έ)ONE-BE-US(Έ.-♥¨΄

May 11, 4:45am: .*.†.*.♥΄¨΄-♥.ΈΈ.-♥΄¨΄-♥.Έ)US BE ONE(Έ.♥-΄¨΄♥-.ΈΈ.♥-΄΄¨♥.*.†.*.

Mukasey Refuses to Say Yoo Fourth Amendment Memo Withdrawn
By Paul Kiel - April 10, 2008, 11:24AM

During a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing this morning, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) questioned Attorney General Michael Mukasey about that October, 2001 Justice Department memo in which John You found that the Fourth Amendment, which protects citizens against "unreasonable searches and seizures," had "no application to domestic military operations."

Has that memo been withdrawn? If not, was it still in force? Feinstein wanted to know.

She found it difficult to pry an answer loose. "I can't speak to the October, 2001 memo," Mukasey said when she asked whether it had been withdrawn. He said that Yoo's later March, 2003 memo -- which broadly authorized the use of torture by military interrogators on unlawful combatants -- had been withdrawn, but refused to discuss that October, 2001 memo.

That memo remains classified, and Mukasey said that working to declassify portions of or entire secret Justice Department legal memos by Yoo and others was a "priority" of his, but he refused to supply a timeline for when he might make those determinations. He was very mindful of Congress' "legitimate oversight role," he said.

"This isn't a question of oversight," Feinstein said. "I'm just asking you, 'Is this memo in force that the Fourth Amendment does not apply?"
"The principle that the Fourth Amendment does not apply in wartime is not in force," Mukasey replied.

"That's not the principle I asked you about," Feinstein countered. The memo referred to domestic military operations, she said.

"There are no domestic military operations being carried out today," Mukasey replied.

"I'm asking you a question. That's not the answer."

"I'm unaware of any domestic military operations being carried out today," he repeated.

"You're not answering my question," she said.

Finally, Mukasey responded, "The Fourth Amendment applies across the board whether we're in wartime or peacetime. It applies across the board."

When Feinstein pronounced herself satisfied, Mukasey said, "with due respect, I don't think there's anything really new about that answer." He went on to imply that Yoo's discussion of the applicability of the Fourth Amendment had not been a crucial aspect of that memo. "The discussion of which that was a part... means the inaptness... the suggested inapplicability of the Fourth Amendment as an alternative basis for finding that searches discussed there would be reasonable."

"But Mr. Yoo's contention was that the Fourth Amendment did not apply and that the President was free to order domestic military operations," Feinstein replied.

"Without regard to the Fourth Amendment?"

"Yes."

"My understanding is that is not operative."

The Washington Post reported last week that the Justice Department "repudiated the idea that there are no constitutional limits to military searches and seizures in a time of war, saying it depends on 'the particular context and circumstances of the search.'"

Here's video of the exchange: youtube.com/watch [youtube.com/watch]
¨΄♥-.Έ)US-BE-ONE(Έ.-♥¨΄)†(Amen)†(¨΄♥-.Έ)ONE-BE-US(Έ.-♥¨΄

Project for the OLD American Century-liberal news from unbiased sources: May 11, 4:44am 84 reviews politics
http://www.oldamericancentury.org/; .*.†.*.♥΄¨΄-♥.ΈΈ.-♥΄¨΄-♥.Έ)US BE ONE(Έ.♥-΄¨΄♥-.ΈΈ.♥-΄΄¨♥.*.†.*.

The Bush administration said yesterday that it plans to start using the nation's most advanced spy technology for domestic purposes Pages 4-12
Bush admits he authorized torture. And it gets worse from there. Pages 4-12
¨΄♥-.Έ)US-BE-ONE(Έ.-♥¨΄)†(Amen)†(¨΄♥-.Έ)ONE-BE-US(Έ.-♥¨΄

May 11, 4:38am: .*.†.*.♥΄¨΄-♥.ΈΈ.-♥΄¨΄-♥.Έ)US BE ONE(Έ.♥-΄¨΄♥-.ΈΈ.♥-΄΄¨♥.*.†.*.

¨΄♥-.Έ)US-BE-ONE(Έ.-♥¨΄)†(Amen)†(¨΄♥-.Έ)ONE-BE-US(Έ.-♥¨΄

Please login or join to view older archives

StumbleUpon is the best way to discover great web sites, videos, photos, blogs and more - based on your interests. Everything is submitted and rated by the community. Discover, share and review the best of the web!

Join StumbleUpon Today >

StumbleUpon

Favorites » Her Blog

People she is a fan of

Show pages she liked about